TrialPath
Recruiting

Comparison of Synthetic Mammography Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography in Image Interpretation and Performance Metrics

NCT05056818 · M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
In plain English

Click the button to translate this study into plain language — what it is, who qualifies, and what participation looks like.

About this study
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To analyze the characteristics, utility, and impact of synthetic mammography (SM), as compared with full-field digital mammography (FFDM). OUTLINE: Patients' medical records and past imaging examinations are reviewed.
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * Female * Age 18 or older * Consecutive cases in breast imaging center Exclusion Criteria: * Cases demonstrate administrative or technical errors (e.g. missing views, labeling inconsistent with report, etc.)
Study design
Enrollment target: 750 participants
Age groups: adult, older_adult
Timeline
Starts: 2020-12-15
Estimated completion: 2026-10-31
Last updated: 2026-04-16
Interventions
Other: Electronic Health Record Review
Primary outcomes
  • To analyze the impact of synthetic mammography (SM), as compared with full-field digital mammography (FFDM (through study completion, an average of 1 year)
Sponsor
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center · other
Contacts & investigators
ContactRay C Mayo, MD · contact · rcmayo@mdanderson.org · 713-745-4555
InvestigatorRay C Mayo · principal_investigator, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
All locations (1)
M D Anderson Cancer CenterRecruiting
Houston, Texas, United States
Comparison of Synthetic Mammography Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography in Image Interpretation and Performance Metrics · TrialPath